Shake! Shake! Shake! Shake! Shake! Shake!

And while we're on the topic of disco, one of the most prominent, successful and definitive disco bands of the 1970's was K.C. and The Sunshine Band, led by frontman Harry Wayne Casey. Formed in 1973, the group had a string of enormously popular dance hits, a run which came to a screeching halt in 1980, as disco itself, along with its sartorial accoutrements, met its demise.

K.C.'s songs are disco par excellence. The requisite elements are all present and accounted for:

• as one disco enthusiast beautifully described, a "happy chord progression in the minor scale";
• mid-tempo percussion and bass occupying center-stage;
• electric guitar confection;
• exclamation marks from the trumpets;
• refreshingly shallow lyrics extolling the virtues of dancing

and voilà!

But one of the most salient characteristics of K.C.'s songs is not to be found in the above list. The chorus of one of their biggest hits illustrates the feature nicely:

Shake shake shake, shake shake shake,
Shake your booty! Shake your booty!
Oh, shake shake shake, shake shake shake,
Shake your booty! Shake your booty.

(That I had no idea -- nor to this day am I entirely sure -- what exactly booty is never diminished my enjoyment of this delicious musical tidbit one iota.) In any event, we are struck by K.C.'s propensity to repeat, in part or in entirety, the titles of his songs.

To test the veracity of this observation, I listened to three K.C. songs and counted the number of times the title appears. The results are corroborative:

• I'm Your Boogie Man: 24
• Keep It Coming Love: 33
• That's The Way (I Like It): 30

Now I had always thought this repetitiveness was simply a product of happy-go-lazy songwriting, but a while ago, I learned that this was far from the case.

[K.C.] worked part-time in a record store. He noticed often that customers would come in not remembering the titles of the records they wanted, and the store would lose the sale — this is the reason so many of his songs repeat their titles over and over.

Clearly, these early experiences had a dramatic (is it going too far to say obsessive?) impact on K.C. So the repetitiveness, far from signifying an indifference to the lyrics, was, on the contrary, a decidedly calculated move on K.C.'s part, stemming from a savvy commercial instinct.

Music critics and die-hard fans often use the phrase "going commercial" or "selling out" when they feel that a musician has shifted styles, producing less serious music, in order to appeal to a broader audience. (Given that I was usually part of said broader audience, I was never bothered by this.)

But K.C.'s ploy takes the commercial angle of songwriting to a whole nother level, as they say. For it is one thing to craft a song in a style which will be pleasing to the masses, and will therefore lead to increased record sales. But it is another thing altogether to craft a song which is, in essence, an advertisement of itself. Here, the medium has truly become the message, and the message is to purchase the medium!

Indeed, one part of the K.C. song "That's The Way (I Like it)" has the backup singers whispering "That's The Way" over and over again, reminiscent of how in the 1950's, in certain movie theaters, the projectionist would flash the words "Drink Coke" on the screen, in the hopes of sending a subliminal message to the audience -- the difference being that in K.C.'s case (not to be confused with Casey Kasem), the advertisement is self-referential.

Self-referentiality is not completely absent in other items that we consume:

• Printed material, displaying the title in the margin of each page;
• Fashion designer clothing bearing the logo;
• Car hood ornaments.

But in the above, the self-reference is marginal: the ornament or label is but one small part of the product. With K.C.'s songs, the entire product, from virtually start to finish, trumpets itself.  I cannot think of any medium other than the pop song that carries the potential for a product to announce itself over and over, whereby the entire product has become an advertisement for itself.

In contrast, consider this chorus, of a song which came out just 2 years prior to K.C.'s debut:

Don't you remember you told me you loved me now baby
You said you'd be coming back this way again, baby
Baby, baby, baby, baby, oh baby
I love you, I really do.

The title of this lovely Carpenters ballad? Superstar. Not only is the title completely absent from the lyrics -- one is hard-pressed to find the remotest connection in the lyrics to it. Perhaps this was one of those very songs whose title escaped a customer's memory, awakening K.C.'s keen commercial instincts.

Abbie Hoffman's Steal This Book, with its vehemently anti-commercial title, is K.C.'s diametric opposite. Indeed, a book penned by K.C. would be entitled Buy This Book (Don't You Dare Steal It!). In fact, I have an idea for a new song for K.C., "Buy This Song (You'll Like It)". K.C., if you're reading this, the rights are yours. And if it's as good as your hits of the 70's, I just may and I probably will.

Ludwig Van Boogie

As Beethoven was to 19th century music, so was disco to 1970s music. And, to take this already absurd analogy to its inescapable absurd conclusion, the 1970s saw a confluence of the two: a disco-fied version of Beethoven's 5th Symphony, A Fifth of Beethoven (to be accompanied by a fifth of Jack Daniels?), a gloriously preposterous amalgam of the sublime and the ridiculous. One wonders (well, at least I wonder!) what Beethoven would have made of this unlikely hybrid. Would he have turned a deaf ear to it?

Purely gratuitous aside: I wondered whether there was a word in the English language signifying the process of rendering something in disco style. Disco-fy? Disco-ize? Disco-grify? Having settled on disco-fy, I am now struck by how science-fictional it rings, which has planted the idea in my mind for a movie where alien invaders attack earth, armed with weapons which turn humanoids into people with three-piece suits and no tie, gold chains, platform shoes, with one finger pointed heavenward. Lord help us, doctor -- he's been discofied!

One undeniable property of disco music, no matter how silly one finds it, is how eminently danceable it is. The moment your body hears that crazily funky bass line, harnessed to that syncopated African beat, sprinkled with electric guitar wah-wahs and short blasts from the horn section, try as you might to stop it, it will spring into action.

First, your head and shoulders will start swaying from side to side. Next, your legs will start a-quivering, while your feet are a-tapping on the floor. Soon, your entire torso is oscillating in your seat. And before you realize it, your body has picked itself up from your chair, and is dancing with wild abandon, shaking like the leaves on a tree. Go ahead, listen to the proffered video. I defy you to remain absolutely still!

Couldn't do it, couldja? See?

The Professor and The Dirty Driveway

As mentioned in an earlier post, during my high school years, on Sabbath mornings, I used to attend a small Synagogue, known as a Shtiebl, as it was located in the basement of a house. I served the role of chanting the weekly portion of the Torah.

One of the few congregants under the age of 65 was an economist, originally from England, who at the time was a professor at the University of Toronto, and who has had a most distinguished career in the field of the history of economics, spanning roughly five decades.

As his house was just a hop, skip and jump from the Synagogue, he used to occasionally invite me over afterwards for Kiddush. For those readers of mine who are unfamiliar with this term, it is, for the purposes of the present context, the ritualized equivalent of coffee and cake.

His better half, hailing from France, is a sweet, demure, intelligent woman. To my teenage mind, she struck me as decidedly reminiscent of a charming character out of a 19th century novel. The three of us would have quite a pleasant time, sitting at their dining room table, engaged in stimulating conversation.

I recall that he once showed me a book he had recently completed, and told me that he was now in the process of putting together the index. He explained to me how creating a book's index was a much more difficult process than most people might realize. (I imagine that all of the advances in computers of the past three decades have automated that process considerably.)

On one particular occasion, the professor and I happened to be standing by the window of his living room, and were presently joined by his wife. We noticed that their neighbor's driveway was full of dirt, and that the neighbor was cleaning the driveway with a water hose. He would very slowly sweep the stream of water across the width of the driveway. When he reached the end, he would advance the stream slightly, and reverse direction, now sweeping the other way. In this manner, the dirt was gradually pushed forward along the driveway, towards the street.

Interestingly, all three of us fell under the hypnotic spell of the action of the hose. It was somehow mesmerizing to watch that border, separating the now-clean portion of the driveway from the still-dirty territory, advance forward, inch by inch (or, for my metric friends, centimeter by centimeter) under the propulsion of the spray of water, like an army division pushing a battle-line forward. The effect was oddly soothing as well.

*Ring!* Hello?

Hi, Frank! What are you doing right now?

Nothing much. What's up?

Well, our neighbor is unwinding his hose -- it looks like he's about to clean his driveway!

Hey, awesome! I'll be right over -- try to make sure he doesn't start till I get there!

Will do, but try to hurry. Carol and David are already here, and I've invited Bev and Gus over too. And the popcorn is in the microwave!

Quite a while the three of us stood there, captivated by this curious form of entertainment which is unlikely to win any awards anytime soon.

Until finally, the professor looked at his wife and me and said: "What are we doing?!" The spell broken, the three of us looked at one another, simultaneously burst into laughter and then returned to the dining room, to resume our conversation.

Postscript. Speaking of being easily entertained, in Street Gang, the encyclopedic chronicle of the television show Sesame Street, author Michael Davis tells us that in the mid-1960s, when children's television was still in its, uh, infancy, children who were up early in the morning would turn on the television and sit and stare at the test pattern until 7 a.m., when the daily programming would begin. If only they had neighbors with dirty driveways...

One-Time Smoker

I have several memories of the typical events that would take place in the mornings of my childhood. You know, the regular morning rituals, such as brushing your teeth, packing your schoolbag, eating toast and orange juice. And, of course, the sound reverberating throughout your entire house, of someone coughing without end. *Cough*, *cough*, *cough*. Yet another minute, and yet another. Horrible, raspy hacking sounds that come from the depths of the chest cavity. Culminating, just as often as not, in a gag reflex leading to actual cough-induced vomiting.

This was the morning ritual which my poor father had to go through, the effects of a three-pack-a-day habit. Unfiltered, I might add. As a consequence, throughout my life, the thought of smoking never once entered my mind.

I recall once asking a friend in my senior year of high school, out of idle curiosity, whether he smoked. His answer: "You know what I think makes more sense than smoking. To take a comb made out of steel, and comb my skin with it, so that the skin peels off and starts to bleed." His response graphically expresses how utterly untempting the notion of smoking was for me.

I'm reminded of a show I once saw on television decades ago. (How odd, and oddly pleasant, to be able to conjure up stories several decades old!) The show, "Scared Straight", was a documentary of a program being used on at-risk teenagers. These teenagers were on the road to a life of drugs and crime, and nobody was able to reach them.

The solution: these teenagers were put alone in a room with some of the more hardened specimens from the penitentiary. (I cannot recall whether the encounters were one-on-one or group settings.) Quite a sight to see these cocky, ornery teens suddenly swallow and become meek as lambs, in the face of the display of ferocity from those inmates. Scared Straight, all right.

My idea for a Scared Straight program: play for youths a video of the first 30 minutes of a typical day of a heavy smoker, in all its non-stop coughing, hacking, wheezing, gasping, and vomiting glory. Every day for a week. My prediction: the percentage of youths who take up smoking will plummet.

One day, a year out of high school, I saw a close friend of mine, who adheres to the proverbial straight and narrow path as closely as anyone I know, smoking. Well, land sakes alive! My shock was such that, if memory serves correctly, I literally snatched the cigarette right out of his mouth and crushed it, followed by quite a stern lecture.

Thus, for the first 45 years of my life, a lit cigarette had never entered my mouth. (I may have once put an unlit one in my mouth.) But two years ago, a friend of mine was over one evening, and we were relaxing and talking. She is a light smoker. I do not allow smoking in my home -- my friends know that they must retire to the balcony when they feel the need to indulge.

But for some reason, on this particular evening, I allowed her to light up in my living room. After a minute, I said to her: "Let me have a try." Her eyes wide-open in utter disbelief, she handed me her cigarette. I held it in my hands, and put it to my mouth. I drew upon it, inhaling deeply, thus, at the ripe age of 45, becoming a first-time smoker.

I loved it! What a rich, pleasing taste! And, much to my surprise, I did not cough in the least. For the next minute or so, I took several more drags on that cigarette, enjoying that satisfying aroma. (Tastes good -- like a cigarette should.) And then handed the cigarette back to her.

Since that evening nearly two years ago, I have not tried another cigarette, nor has the thought as much as crossed my mind. But something about the notion of never having even tried a cigarette made me feel like I was regarding cigarettes as more powerful than myself, as if in order to guarantee that I not fall under their spell, I must make sure to never so much as try one -- otherwise, I would become enslaved to them. Now, having tried one, I know that they are a pleasant indulgence, but one that I can easily choose to forgo.

Postscript. I am pleased to add that, about 20 years ago, my father gave up his decades-long habit of smoking, through the aid of the nicotine patch. Kudos, Dad.

My Best Is My Worst

Back in the early 90's, when I was living in Manhattan, a high school friend of mine was as well, and we would get together occasionally. At the time, he had a girlfriend, and the two of them were so close that I took it for granted that they would be together forever. Sadly, that was not the case.

I remember them telling me one evening that the very quality that initially attracts you to a romantic partner is the very same quality that will ultimately lead you to break up with them.

Now when they told this to me, it sounded like utter nonsense. In other words, if you are attracted to someone because they are kind, that means that you will ultimately break up with them because they are kind?! Completely illogical. I couldn't for the life of me fathom why they would say something like that.

It would take more than a decade and a half for me to finally comprehend the point they were expressing. And not only do I now wholeheartedly agree with it -- it has become one of the core axioms of my belief system.

But to me, the concept goes far beyond the context of relationships -- it goes to the very heart of what we as human beings are. In a nutshell: my best is my worst.

What I mean to say is that those very qualities that exist within us that we are so proud of, and that serve us so well is so many different situations, are the very same qualities that get us into trouble in other situations.

One person is gentle, loving, unconditionally accepting, completely uncritical. Wonderful, right? Absolutely. You'd like to meet that person, right? Positively! And yet, that same person may find themselves in a situation where they need to set boundaries because someone is taking advantage of them. Or they may be in a supervising position, and need to discipline someone for inappropriate conduct. Their tendency to express only positive things to others may make it extremely difficult for them to adopt a slightly more authoritative stance which is necessary in such situations.

It works in reverse, too. Our worst can suddenly become our best. I know a woman who is one of the most indifferent, apathetic people I've ever met. And yet, this nature of hers, which most of us would not put on a top 10 list of desirable character traits, serves her beautifully in at least two contexts: (a) She can be very forgiving following situations of conflict. Since she doesn't care about anything (I exaggerate, of course!), she simply doesn't hold grudges! It's all water off her back. (b) In situations of great stress, she is grace personified. Again, since she doesn't care about anything, nothing rattles her.

I've seen this concept in myself as well. I am an extremely focused person. In fact, hyper-focused would not be inaccurate. In my day-to-day work, my ability to focus on the heart of the issue and not get distracted by non-essential details allows me to clearly and logically analyze situations and deal with them systematically. However, this same tendency to focus can lead me to dwell on past events that would best be laid to rest.

I therefore think that in many respects, people do not have strengths and weaknesses. Rather, we have raw qualities, which may manifest themselves as assets in certain situations, and as liabilities in others. Therefore, if there is some aspect of ourselves which displeases us, attempting to remove that aspect from our being may not be the way to go -- for that very aspect may be extremely beneficial to us in other contexts. The more we recognize the dual nature of our basic tendencies, the better equipped we are to refine them, harness them, and to increasingly use them only in ways which will benefit us and others.

Braveheart

When I tell people here in Israel that I moved here from Canada, the second most frequent response I get is how brave it was of me to do so.

(The most frequent response, which I encounter with far greater frequency than the second most frequent response, is one of dumbfounded wonderment: whatever could have possessed me to leave a wonderful country like Canada to come here? I'm not sure whose surprise is greater: that of Israelis, that I willingly chose to move here, or my own surprise that Israelis should be so shocked that someone should find their country a desirable place to live.)

Whenever I am praised for this so-called bravery, I feel morally compelled to protest. My definition of bravery, I say, is when you are truly afraid of taking a certain course of action, but you perform it nevertheless. And this does not apply in the least to my act of moving to Israel.

For I was never, not even for a split-second, scared of moving here:

1. I had been a teacher for several years, and was looking for a career change, and so, was eager to begin a new chapter in my life.
2. I felt confident that Israel's extensive networking system would assist me in making the necessary connections to find gainful employment.
3. I was a single man, and so, I would not have the considerable pressure of supporting a family.
4. Finally, I had absolutely nothing to lose. Living in Israel had been a dream of mine for years. If things worked out, then I would be fulfilling my dream. If they did not, there would be absolutely nothing to prevent me from returning to my native country, and I would have the inner satisfaction of knowing that I had at least tried to live out my dream.

In contrast, take a person who has worked hard to build up a good business, is doing well, comfortable but not fabulously wealthy, supporting a family -- if such a person moves to Israel, he risks losing the lifestyle of security he has established in his country of origin: will he be able to re-create his business? will he find appropriate schooling for his children? and so on. Such a person is indeed a stouthearted man...

One day, about five years ago, the porch light of the house I was living in at the time burned out and I had to fix it. The ceiling of this porch was about 10 feet off the ground, so I had to use a small ladder to reach it.

Now I have had an intense fear of heights for as long as I can remember. See those men on the left? If you study the photo carefully, you will notice that I am conspicuously absent. Indeed, I get a greater sense of vertigo from merely looking at that photo than those men had from actually sitting on that ledge several hundred feet above the splat.

How vastly different are we from one another! Standing on the 3rd or 4th rung of that small ladder to change a light-bulb induced an infinitely more palpable sense of fear in me than lunching way up in the heavens did for these men. And yes, these men would absolutely not fit my definition of bravery. For the part of the brain which tells me to be petrified when looking down from a great height is quite obviously completely absent in theirs.

So if you wish to call me brave for moving to Israel, I will demur. But if you think me brave for changing a lightbulb on a 10-foot-high porch ceiling, I will graciously accept your compliment.

Jumps out of Bed at 6 in the Morning

I taught in a Jewish school in the Boston area for several years in the nineties. One of the families I became close with had a son in the high school who was on the school's basketball team. He was not very tall, but what he lacked in height, more than made up for in agility and ability.

One of the many kindnesses I received from this family was their allowing me to stay with them for a while one summer when I was between apartment leases. You certainly learn a lot from living with people! The members of this family were warm, interesting and down-to-earth. It was actually a wonderfully fun time for me. (And dare I hope for them as well?)

Anyway, early one morning, I heard someone stirring. It was the basketball athlete, lacing his running shoes. I looked at the clock and saw that it was 6 in the morning. I asked him what he was doing. He said he was getting dressed to go out and shoot some hoops in a local schoolyard. Why? Because he liked playing basketball.

Oh, did I love hearing that! To enjoy an activity so much that you enthusiastically spring out of bed at 6 in the morning on a vacation day to get busy at it. If you too, dear reader, have an interest that arouses your sense of excitement in this way, then you are blessed. And if you haven't yet discovered it, I truly wish that you do soon. Painting, skateboarding, writing, gourmet cooking, ballroom dancing, glass blowing or all of the above. Just try to not disturb the others who are still sleeping, when you get up at 6 in the morning. Although if you do by mistake, and they understand why you're up, I'm sure they'll share in your joy.